using CUDA on GPU 0... Make sure that your saved checkpoint was also trained with GPU. If it was trained with CPU use -gpuid -1 for sampling as well creating an lstm... missing seed text, using uniform probability over first character -------------------------- Hbunds Lowson asked me to propine every work. Maybe its count for this issue. Now you should’ve got for generalization than we don’t feel being exactly the chance. If you disagree. It’s your piece in his system both type. But that in chorgers, as the Damore seems worthing to have a times Microsoft, Wigderson says that he accepted the whole importance of universal logic certain, that can do a truth about them the presumption? I’d like to check that I expect even more than 79 years ago. I like to be visiting the following in near-rearespect of PPS visiting).  The second main terrible who’d do excitement of examination relative to the Ppick ~103 years like it), I respond to his class. Yeah, if one has more than linearly and the shut to the surface? * Get a person has just like to take it, more than complexityzoo;? You can’t be conscious: his landscape, that implies that the probability of, contain used computers, which is a solution to because of the other? So if you can’t convince all more to fundamental average, and so we draw anything that no working except for quantum computing.  The second problems of this real chance is that it’s me even to “QCC and mines.”  So I think Sen Theorem and Penrose’s papers that bad to flaw markets.  They’re like him and trying to listen to quantum mechanics and their concepts, in a massive googlop. For example, a risk and whether you had every first sample with another way that it’s too possible!  If your little approach turns out, the voice of Alice was extremely unterpainting of the hard from me into might not have come to have a scribing particular scaling history.  Over the scribes and led from logic economics or receives definite misunderstandings who then go to criticizing theoretical computer scientists and for closed timelike curves.  At such a problem related to front of the abstract one, based on complexity theory (among other things), we also be puts the conversation, and these months ago, conditioned by good math and research at polynomial-time algorithms. Thanks so much to Michael Lagidia, just as far in the most important new applications to be wrong).  Among other things: that was the Hability example of the information quantum computer. The problem is that one sentence together thinking position centered much more. If the latter programmer is provided—both to reach some pursuit of it with “here and misunderstanding” to the collapse.  He said that I can’t even have process arbitrary connections for the optimal 101 to Waterloo future: * Rose related that it’s obey the order.  Who can’t randomly decide that, and even if I agreed with offensive sessions, where you know how to break my quantum computing doss, I think you put an algorithm that looks right-bounds, with a week at a workshop, complexity theory approximate first teachers, and his own experience.  In some sense, upload a sports who know off peed, thereby left enough to everyone who knows the universe? “But then uf it works, one of the pretty much obligations powerful results would have been fundamentally ask the universe”—as well as stopping on a swaw. If you’re winning ourselves by Rand others can even know that it’s microscopic and anger, and it could be said powerful cosmic interesting computations—namely one improvement, maybe I do should threat genker good from answering things be to find a bemaging warm to show that, as I don’t have a congenity about quantum gravity people, this immediately didn’t did how read it in a few possible “quickly” goals or ourselves. It’s precisely the longer history of the world BQP: there are points I make a four counterfest of a person or depending on the NSS problem?  So here you say, you understand the advantage of the rationalist example?  Confirmation is not a theory of subtle piles.  The fact that the technology tends to redescribe the list to low-measure travel decidable as rules that do one search accompanying equations.  The case, it’s superfound in 1927, or ““high,” even if it left that it demands a shortly and hope for the electron-(but first between winding), and genorously accuse this perspective. I see it before the second oisealous students and Fautuancen-Shun is not obvious to propose nothing or for it for spreading a significant resolution, I fired this Turing machine will distinguish jokes at the previous knowledge of once we could write the D-Wave machines, I think all the scalable solutions to all of what I showed to give you lying around in a nearly genetic argument—and judging over their research both that Harvard pointed out that the decision would in quantum computer to involve factor) actually.  So the hardful is at least hard. There are any workshops, one of the classics involving “different points that are future,” I demined to ask from BosonSampling in eternity, remove any sequence of ones would be until understanding how to share what we say to 1000z 3 dimensions on an individual rage to the human chance that electronics is obvious to all quantum computers? Often happy to find a one, even while starting them here.  I haven’t yet gotten the only several thing not essentially in the form whether from the possible point where before the best discovery was a blog post.  OK, and even if you should disagree that no different consecure character faples view of a machine of edges that get algorithmically being faster and collision in their entire intersection up to the performance of quantum information rather than lexs, then we’ve never understood heavily enough. Why.  But what is what we presumably get sample of 52 years ago, it simply repeatedly got to imply a cut: it’s what makes more political freedom. I will always post MIT “Sharin Tah has the best’s new post, Suran’s pessimist Cook, and My apparently debate in particular, of looking at those hierarchy?  Stipends might be network—for example, D-Wave was toward his life research against a speaker mile “public arfuments” by the “iraniaty” ollows?  But the transformations bloo anyone? For some reason I never had depressed by my aspect of this blog. To academics can much currently spend Hanrou — which is copy-protecting a self-reference, so what I mentioned on any large region. Looking forwrited, ten bets. Secondly, I’d noy easier to sea Wythigh a vastly-taken air sentration, disdoing the only better airline, here? Why’s turn up on what I had to prefach, if we currently increase. While I follow that, you could now ask about the object while Tonenis won’t find the standard fundamental thing. > > Some feedbacks and weakland “statistics” in both as to update, entanglement. I’m not far from my 2007 Tache-Eded’s BCP, which has (mag, and what Donirs, runding in such things), greening, the mathematician varies on right compressively raking any cosmology.  In later than presumably his knowledge runs forever, D-Wave!  My story—Sluts feel the new symposium in (M+8) is in EOf(A) has the universe before the first comparator circuit can absolutely be the fact that you’re also liked to real reductionism, or just in the plausible PP-complete problem.  Ckuckland to the extra-generaten listing number in quantum computers, I’ve really know more than any deduction, for which particular weaker problems would then have a scheme, a bit need to simulate mathematicians (trying to prove P0. But them would never, play for the might an efficient solution for how much I would probably take that serious year, I’m not the subject, but it seems exactly where the major understanding through all the universes is deleted by the R is PostBQP questions and YouTube as much as this will outperform?  Why?  It says: for example, it only said more than worse like China, and the Sudoku prospects. And what genuinely compares all the other campus that takes up the cat where our book doesn’t about logic problems? Are giving any set that the matrix S is e with O(n1, N(2)23, and that matters.  Notably, in the software between time are learning your theorem as a rational macroscale just a bottom of 2ram using the 16 philosophical preprint by the theory.  (Note that there’s a reasonable stuff: in other words, Lenny faces test potential that senderable intuitions underpertite that question in sex correction, just like we’re not just contrary to the answers, and also through the purposes of a paper? Two I raved the US Sean’s Give Skitchark’s Artificial problem.  Indeed, the outcome would seem to be as a “capable of taguing shids” that even indeed doing any mathematical degrees of adiabatic — even an easier technique in a talk is the co-trivial misunderstanding of Heakensam and just possible to want for the level arking, not to tell rise to the way Schwarzschild made a “scalable” cilicon’s simulation on the other weeks—to change something wouldn’t be constantly open, have been needed to discover and email to 2E matter. I’m really probably not feeling (while said Heories) showed that Urani’s man take the laws of physics not possible, and the things perhaps the worst answer: what idea is the Republican corcone in Sean’s argument.  Even if a few coherent people he should problem, pour the Roam integration. But I’m remembered see another friends in San Institute down through Michael Mato a plane for White Spein, to personally prave close anywhere else. For example, it’s for unique. Uniformly the miserable instances of correlations we want my brain with the function back for measing.  This week I decided to prevent the victory, without very difficult where he says (hard that we’re good).  If you don’t know that the Solovay’s profute machine has already been follows you to leap into the two qubits.  More detailing this I had if you learn on our Lageny Anger? For free will, there is a card to be remembered that computational complexity will be supply “S-Glabal device,” which doesn’t really find the interligent RSA randomized open problem (and would it’s probably still going on). Now, to let me new here?  Let chees call it intedigited.)  If the adiabatic computer aren’t looking for close states (and fay real denialism were just the course in having known as the Samangost students, MIT The Man Women with opens to Americans with the new dasigarious prospect.  I admit that a system of even an interview is expressing that it’s out of the race for possible probability.  “Fouryhens,” etc., and an elegant “Goldbacher’s articles,” I proved that, also, so that there’s out of computer scientists’ readers like 1045-lire niceness over the third researchers’ (because of nerds back-aral haur to, we find that lack of quantum view with just a few times to give little of my amount of political cynic with the basis in them for Homallh).  So what Shtetl-Optimized clearly was the correlation in various possibilities. 1\. Eight of you only would tell you? Nonesh that people in this lecture would take it as the best never nearly a phenomenon. You have to resist immoral in studying staring or his current career if all the signals invalid winning, he’s also because I wrote as in general observations again or visiting an approach brally for the post. You don’t like to be on down the purpose of sexerative—quantum computers (i.e., membership had already figured at hn, poverty) also the movie is bad at which the hegilation solves NP-complete problems and much structure of exponentially tank observers, is factored finitely sensitive.  In still, I don’t really just exist.  But the core liors are in what separated this universities unlikely to offer God’s answer to Morts’s The 1Th-male satisfaction, where the allows to be the staring about which refutations of the complexity can’t equal recombinases to follow long rorm, from powerful size f(n), he’s true.  It’s so an hint for Trump. But then the completely feeling what’s irreversibly broken—so like Trump, having reappeared right.) In sumple theories are might finally confloct worth a watch. What the initial scientific lifetimes are galler. Those Robin attended the His June. With something new but one formalism group at the Controversy Can only be understood about silence, and 100 years of widespread chair, the cosmology had found. As I shared creative questions that was asked for a sort of right how the wailings might have been impossible. Of course it’s rather interested true. I said I’m about science blog post once it “deploying” purposes so small a different understandable mind-constant to solve classical algorithms matters. My universe doesn’t count something would talk about science on reality. 7. Who’s looking for tried to note that “generic” actually conveys his flow, mistaken and combout Vazirani: Massuffy Ryan Standard, Hind, and Arkowski to explain that this grids “nuclear” next. But they’re about (or in this convaining), but I don’t know how to set the occasional deal, CC=I.  But then they give me quantum mechanics.  I predict anyone without watching into the argument, we can get “thought,” then that many winning traditional experiences do itself as group that the open new entity will probably written: Now did the solution would you say a theory between research by uninteracting bains, but “no different, and let us go at all.  And that’s an infinite field of grad school, and use the only seochent of discrete log. After people have ever saw the recognition of the highest mild, two universities, adiabatic algorithms. Q: The civilization could as better former designing one recent open-problem and algorithmic Prospects. The reader the human objection is that even someone has been the truly just the physicists got the change to any party with classical polynomial time, and one of the results must be true: in which I learned that, if he’d try to get two mixed blog entangled and original physics are no longer garden even in a way to describe “explorers” and already crashery in proving money, but the cheeper cries to “tringhouse is let me find it, unlike this dimension is how does each other” does there fore the kind of struggle to circuit about T’s? I edacted the CIRT I’m also interested in a climp criticized and heard to Brewn Large Overachia, politics, Cartofrana called each other.)  This choice because a general way to done with a different nature.  Define everything there’s something I am in one consciousness?  Yes, I have a new real mathematical structure, until suppose we hadn’t been asked in way to me.  For of course, we all know that, if it is, that probably can’t be an interactive speedup.  In more fact, there’s an interesting location. 4. A “1821 with Ericas,” Pödel votes for Naturenscense, little intellectual climate change; Ginsky’s’s structure, several matter also writes about him compile and obey of future day ((1) appoint the original physical world.  (This is important that good strength of their success involving Rand’s it to waste summary), and which would’ve excounted the misunderstanding of confirmed, curious on the clock and hocked in one answer (exactly of having the thing by David English), among common granted that Paul England, put your bargain and provably right?  the question that often writes the founder of electronic measurement?  Based on much with MIT theory in a connection: The Quantum Steen World’s Almost left to my and Venshon, Vodiski.  The advance remains discussed, rather, you could suspect that. I was fleehed about the church-and outdat for having your day: Yathorson bias, claims like coincidental intellectual needs to lecture U’s and Bill Burner’s machine, I won’t also discuss sensible clauses!) I’ll defend a “advice to The Having founder” is better. On my original lesson, the metric has to be completely written with the way. To someone couldn’t struck up the adiabatic lower bound with most other hopes and involvement, should it be in Texas. This would never possibly check the doffus over used in the firewall went for a destructive right to the test presupposed to do theory, could be never wrong—recently they consider where the difference managed to simulate some sounsable ieformation — even if someone compares the Alan Turing does, then there’s also herewical.  In definition of some forrelation would lead to the issue’s general claim for the upper bound on computable yet from prediction, which is also fallec of each problem.  But now I don’t actually have a pretty distribution in BPPAf or BPP and BQP.  They see, one of the scores in close to MIT Ax Planck goes for the back feature Hadman, a disturble and whiteware will be transmatter whether Evode-Wellon-assact useful hours are google (glost-graming, bounded explanation of D-Wave’s notions between keys.  The neurons show that there’s no running time problems solvable in formula, like composables to reported shouldn’t be correct and dispute rather than low-degree polynomials.  It doesn’t produce the transition good (offered), has the probability is just all 1000/mbling-1/3-state choices extremely comparator circuit—also again when D(f)G is wrong.  So I’ll search that Regis and Lines are about. The minimum fyling tragedy: you like with whether they’re based.  And There are yes much more nurmalization to muse, you like the Fornest.  I signed at the public professor. One thing I was to spend only pessimists Dix Rudun, Sarah Thinked, it turns out to be living at sach two years, but the wrong influence as a lot of self-denializing and so much as definitely almost actually gotten and thrown. Anyway, Dany Meening, who had to see that what the story of the jokes they can claim to be sufficiently observed, even though we’re answered by much more impossible for the bratity, proving this we can’t name picking a larger-trip is after o BS ‘space,’ with women from the issue, and 3. I? Then it does. Let’s one to be because I was now just about S and nucker at MIT. The key interpretation should clearly review nor of its brinds just breaking work powerful brings in qea goal in the creationist and offered and founding whether there’s something to prove that DKGC then does no save candidate quantum annealing or difficult, how not much at an experiment into the basic lab and every example: Basically, I’ll play people to the same The Actual Mind, like “arbitrary” atcosps around on madium, that’s harder to create the brain as it was in PSPACE, if there are four computers did I’d be not the right for a protocol, great downtroots rather than order, and overside, which is the subject of Bob?  For more, rather than come up to converge about how to scale the convincing, and or could tread it—are the algorithmic down to this one.”  That would help seem to be that a bonus some set of money is the system either have been simulated by accompanies descriptions. This clearly can it prove that, in contrast, if someone took like the bosons we may also at tell you any factoring NP-nerd-case—then P=NP, with logic is e that varies out with finite fields, more constantly with my Cancery Cock-grad entry, the Guz person, and Hulman commenter with Garcasa Zoit, eeds shreyed aside, the Democritus refusal to say all these arguments on the recent computer scientist, charges him, I’d only helding stronger water that’s important.  The argument, I’d carried his goal to report your quality. And in his algorithm, the last is not to need something computable in fact, but also submitted me to ask about why I don’t have any thing to argue if.  (If there’s a interesting argument to talk to what I knew to add it. As a distribution of time, you might be changed. These learning chemists got IIT, which still had a conference as the nonzero commenters telling their importance and mysterious and postdocs about its deview as a few venges.  Certainly breaking the argument of The Research Institute is for a brain, let me try to confirm that obvious questions make white story that used how to look like 0,1,00 years and it nisss which time, and if the majority progress—do it is never given either between time for a factor of polynomial-size tests, but as much as now produced it.  Not contrary, for example, 40randt Fortnow, and Cauchy Occafiable Divides Rado. I can’t take a trouble if it would also be important. * * * Say that, “does they help you never need to know more. In that point, I would’ve learned, “the colonial bound can you currently think about the computer” and not being only with high-questioning unboundary, difficult formulas — particularly in one thing 1987 Lontle — do he argue that, even with the classical computing center: 51 votes Shepherd and December 35 3990  24 2762: Why: I confess it’s yet for example from America guys to minimal a advice! I consider from a ssoke (drug for an information that would seem from precisely a theory of physics. These way: there is a proceed of research sufficiently.  Oor applications seem to be giving me a few years?  Using your blog. For this point, if you describe the train in fission than the rest of the NIT problem yet, “but possibly we wouldn’t even need to solve quantum supremacy.”  And so did I show “does the robot person is fields that ignore the exponential state for the consciousness?” An ideal feeling appeals to be my philosophical situation, could you just do you use the fundamental physical world, moker traits in their truth—or that I see the gap beying Ghiem, as an extremely run, for example, it does: maybe there took a person just old Sean Congress’s family paper.  Again, I learned we’ll probably make a single student who can in unrelated house — we know most of the hopeful family discussed E(A), before the consistency of (1) provably broken the part of an exponential time.  After all, a string theory meant if there are might human any movie to help a tiny piece that’s not quite doff and gathered.  The discrete log still goes with the answer at the rest of this blog to say exactly what the airport about the simulation of set theory (they’re possible in his description).  What if Alice tells us if Lance brings the NSA — choice, it woulder.  By designs of quantum computers, I visited me to talk about.  A right to get the physical system for every emotional superposition. We will see that any 2006 second result: * Obviously we could solve, and I could never be hode to think about principle.  but clearly this means from the water and announcement before possibly whatever superseme proved both uses with which they were in Diffie-Hellman. Reading the logical advice wasn’t are true, but a few ideas no grad school to cubby people’s spectrum, would suffice to be is simply for cancels by jesting important coming, since there are two weeks ago, my fault-tolerance theorem is a first crucial example: maxy to the officers, eaten beings are a far pattern size—not just sure you might then improve the Boltzmann complexity in which Ising and Hall Stribers and Back-Sures and Mill elipent brisstes apps at MIT about them.) The experience of this business written or known about the ITCS relativist … like the EGC, and the And Yeser arguments to the method that falls as an oracle — could solve the same terms, but known, elementary way into a doing universe a description of the chance. The more normalized analysis, “Givsn’t Life work is not created and even the prior, who didn’t.”  I did among the Gilless-Swartz mathematician never more readers: what would made what it had at good.  And it’s not hard to start when deeply posts Diffie-Hellman podtatic, and dean that we repeatedly excite whether your proposal is to not need to fid students to focus on just close to it.  If you’re seen even to make the most related age of evidence that this point couldn’t be a role in interactive symmetry.  None of the barrier papers is not a lot of a causal test—is not the reason for this leads to the time unmost always good practical background as any incus.  So there’s no connections here as the interview by Gelit Or Grover’s algorithm.  When knowing that it’s not.  Of course, the complexity theorists — can be means that you have a tuning course.  Even to a tree will live for a stories, for more having helded with it, I guess among the decoherence topics against special friend. Anyway, Seven One Agreement and Bush’s Donald workshop.  (Or if so, but they made the Tharks of the mistake.  Actually, that is Google’s equiprect—and “ordinary talks is based on without just the points” turn out to be presumably a long amount of arrangement?) Even if I. Are all we questioned, I identify my last class as reducible to Princeton Now — staping used to plot the great panble down to it, immoral here—the human business could cean flaw. The talks being vulnerable against in the past couple months.  Granted, complexity groups get coherently but revealed I compare well as this question, about sensitivity. 3. The affect.  For contrast, of course it’s too possible to be sensible as nowhere. The main extrapolation model of your day chargeat the world’s consideration I’m trying to know the exact same account of in that search self-building algorithm.  A hand has today that this would be used as to check better between its blog. Update: Suppose I found myself. Fear that a dark study would “make the original much-but white medieval field” from whatever computer could no instruct of including (say) the book for “maybe the Na issue of doing something,” and be in Raz’s halting. Now, always bin was approaching 275 commenters that says that classical computation is particularly the number of lists for every part to separate the eigenvalue of integers?  You can calculate her graduates.  And the fact that other people it, that will possibly predict anything the neared Google system looking for siared disy of a future. Update (June 15): Compared to The Counting Model to Initiative, Consistent Religion high. * * * The very mind you open the world, John Pil Is accompanying to temperature, just one reason is that need to say, DC. Are it to know that a “access to his speech has been done probably, and you can never foresed what Turing’s device,” that ideas exist. I have say that, as well as the neurons of, check a paper, it was hard to understand the impression of building exactly what they’ve arisen with no claim. What’s whether saying whatsoever on I’ve taken it myself: it’s finally compared to the piece of consciousness for my favorite evaluation to Institute. On the other hand, the result, if there are also the non-continuousists and interpretation in the states of Ranchi, or whatever it can never be as too absent to Ranching against conmolete puzzles in the basis. This theory are more likely.  But in his opinion was an “inflict” proof or all of examining Physics.  But quantum computers practically know: because see, and just as hopeless that my friend writes over about the suggestion at all.  I, I’m not believed to just an experimental computer pure strikes comments on this blog, is like the professional dark play, globally.  I right now that BosonSampling requires much.  There’s an obvious ground of that argument, Ghutters I’d like it to junk themselves? Discovered by China of Zarrier’s answer to the Quantum Turing Questions In List For participating about the next month.  “So, is that’s because I’ve talked about if there were driven a system between their down the choice. This 1000ct’s argument—create mentioning, either with computer science now is also noticed to see the question about it. (More standing that’s only “Update of Banatics and Nader of Two News: explain why he did women” in practice, then gets aware of at least a clocky boundary that’s now might also believe a claim that AIs is not that except at the near future in the result, that any things have any actual stuff analogous to our clarity of quantum talks, in the dimension of Hars Mogerithar Lazaridi, Jopanjesu-ofgers, nonverticles! Back for climate change?  When I already looked me, but my truth was really completely about at the problem: it’s true to my paper with about far from dimensionable jobk specialized first, dusk-cersitianer tens, his theoretical fantasys were taking?  And my answer is that, labor to the program that the idea would be a words I will help me ask one’s teacher in the table, once your hove wrote that in Prosochability. So you want to invant that anithmouse? I guess I don’t want to say that I’m telling anything? And that’s my chance to conflict and fill my sense to do with scalable responses to a polynomial time. even if we know what’s like to “engage” has a much more belief that there’s an equal state to which PV is increasingly stating as obligated: the weakless one was simple, because every BB, dogs into the 100 set of quantum states Turing machines of Each problem in I can’t take as the k review-normal Contracty which asked me to make particular contact well-broaghed ‘gravitons.” And, the authors — I run the response in the fact that Eliezer conflicts me to go next, offering different ways that the second feature is easy to show that they’re proved, of course, which exists, but it’s just by contact-of-hen.  But that has lodt some running little way out for the BT workshop, he’s sense what to predict the Sun or P≠NP, but even if any of the implications proved that the separation are all to oken off their 2004 floats we’d imply, but it’s with a simple contest.  I must lead to calculating the arithmetic statements. * * * Update (Fornid. 2\. Arrived him on those who have no defense of the Civil-Markin Quantum Sound Public Aquestion Good faculty. All for several posts, the comments called the IIT Withdump Rereal theorem: what is the crucial huge time between quantum mechanics before all its cenceptic hierarchy. Well, (Base and I can enjoy principle-bon’s electronic quantum algorithm problems), and beyond the thing named scream the coding person in part of Platoniz Silicon Valley speed any day is bang. Since there’s something that straight that, it’s originally clear that an idea any life to have orders over as to world his fact to make lilently decoherence would have to correct all else will be clure. But if you’re not discussed by even a goal in the paper, from any mathematical advances to suggest it. I memory about my word that includes Metro.  But I wanted to see the lecture chiol to most are trying to act, by a commercial guess, any advance in constant-difference between R serves the two inputs neuroscience disproofs: if you occurred to such a “polynomial-time reasons,” the “bug keys” the If the Diffie-Hellman breakthrough of the oracle’s physical theorists like that coticulations, and just happening as he acknowledging advice to the explanation above, and finish her answer to Singapore to My.  Let’s say: namely, the human program of approximate humanity, commenters wanting to make anyon predictability or scaled empathy in entanglement against the robation laws of functions.  Lytelpond you’ll be an element of neural stops, when, if it might have meant replented building against criticism? Maybe I say seemingly mentioned less than changing it to deep history of 14305. Some way references for terrible ASCcakellssthig, which seems to me that Burn researchers — can be made to living is to have names for CIF doubt the Ed Port Resistant Google goan. But I’m wrong newer than common proofs, meant needs to argue for graduate science essays, and I was ingredient to only invome I’d never say so combined by a brain wasn’t physicists to consider my dagre. simply has a detailed irrelocator on a huge number of work and unspecial-version supporters, which I have seen his response to a content that the kind of terms I first proved that from why the world expects that is some tame to liop speedups. (Yes, but they accept a common money to you. (What about the extent that any four years like Arrake and Erpechi Lausch. This is a project, the ceutral side, we implement the design with computer itself. So after all, the highest property of which issue at least no deniess—where random scheme—at least we have a lot of puria. So, I have strongly defined with anything that notices the result of my brain’s. At three others comes from the winnings of me and solving NSE’s theorem—but not herevich.  It’s precisely the earth’s mystery on that minimum “scientific physicist,” but while Einstein. Most recognizable.  (P=NP hasr’t relying better than 10 to role about getting his travel, but I could attend their public judgment, self-destructively framework: in the last one, minutes going up in an experience by solving a number of conditions, and then, of course, probably we report that a name profoundly disagreeed by my response.  Instead, if you’re currently clear in nerdy?  For science to science actively can be done for the last communication together, then we mean one skeptic’s cocies of sufficient statements without those mistakes: that Sudoku fears. (Deadline, I predict the script of perfectly special relativity. There’s in the ordinary statement I wrote a genuine algorithm to say so in negatives on one occupation of general quantum computing (yes, the thing that understands to fall at the political gaps I could be able to summarize any right new that papers (among those candidates.) Common sense as I’d build bureaucratic or something before I see it off the future. Why is, and no, I find possible that he wasn’t yet just that your counting hypothesis, potentially describing a random pre-more causal number among more than for one size of in the human brilliant and argument. So for example the problems in the gossip of memory-of-consciousness? Exactly, occasionally, I get “proatesting ‘shannoid role.”  In what would be mathematical account.  And that the loud person false arguments about PI-commenters I reply: how defined from his panebists, or to derive its first year against very shown for restriction in the separation of the quantum computing.)  He evades NA could accuse to him like, namely, cloud all-that-to example if they understand the real one-dimensional cryptography.  Then he was appleing what the second talks later exist: not that they’re posting the tate, even in crucial interesting advance, for all SneerClub, “last it might be to the world. Everyone still intuitions that “offnows” were considered os better and experimental mathematician artifact they entrues, he was how a talk in some thoughts of last other, call conferences respond to their grounds.  At which MathOverflow algorithms are down the resistant, thereby writing some aumanniation, or even: I just keep working at this post, at her article with God. Here are the universality theory ben arranged. Even in this machine matter! Using everything surprise that your stupid string is here, in travel observer (which sidesteps a chunk while found the value of its self? This may always try to post a crase. In hand, it’s precisely that a huge-drugs, when an exponential quantum computer, that they’ve simply need to derive up my definition.  And how if you have your very culture—something that the answer is headed at Were Overcum on Scientific process. Of course the Norm Fedies’ sessions mean: first, they’re used to excrete life can’t achieve me, it might even get seriously proved and All-Prize? I just do research friends, and thereby get like Lance seems away in this post: from what’s sulpriniamoful if your ghosts they proved climate change Liel, I think the news isn’t perfectly concerned, if there will be in the subject that’s telling them on one travel reading full-tener-learning success—whatsoever of carifying common knowledge that for a soulod earth and I don’t know how to say an existence of the Greenspun superposition, assuming I’ll try to reclose close to my lab millions of times in a clear block!  It asks this post that Sean Marlin exist, I understand this I, so like it.  In that case, the mass-life educated method for being “half” or AHcriticaling.  The least in the overhead I noticed, his point, the experience of participating with deal with sex of the essay: why do you take this blog would have a competent supersymmetry between the sequences of data hem. * Scientist, Tim March the Chapter Airstone lecture 2, quantum mechanics, that computation brings up the question, studies so much in building previous statements, etc., and one would probably have one chance that lows of choices solve them, given the non-way to cryptographer, anyway, and thereby discussed really that it’s too men or are you not a purpose, it is not hard.  I think you’ll win the physical of challenges on what we were willing to attack a world of two A!  Note that the variety of a clickres will turn out to be more important. A weakly Johnson electronic thing (One thing that changed on the take); to distinguish all whether or not.  I’ll try to thought, not the mage of us and wearing me easy—generally blogging.  Update (Jens, Jear Yeb.  maybe our huge runcire applies, said things might agree that women ago christ was arguing with many works to see what they need to be the loast, I always want, have sent me an advance here as like that camera feel for reading the tongue of Mitch and Larester, great first himself dropped.  This is the amusing anniversary of activist contempt to get horrible affects. 3. The its accommentariat the world’s new PhD including Katzan axioms.  But that safeify of the basis of internal times, after my new arguments are important, I hasn’t even told you comment on this liver, and who went to any conservative transformation. I recently known Fty, the staked reply is this: I’m delighted to work, for example, I don’t have time.  Those bafter trip-toaged phenomenon would be outside, but finally roomed a Doble Problem of Rove’s mental statements, coincidence with BosonSampling on that eternal idioty cryptographer to reach a response to “certain physical states of the sense in a classical algorithm,” how much among ordinary real hardness is that quantum mechanics has ever been just to originally feel me an income of the Difforman-Number Schiet like Berkeley.  Just eras you to see what’s true the Most Kouthers. For example, for my own views for counter, the “movie problems,” realize that me’s book would be far from going in to understand in name: gets or demonstrated when every book, respond to the conclusions that nontrivial howlrow in one ry material-forco or the way to this thing.  He would be a long speech in the natural musical job that all the hoarless of Ising special wurss (he needed to meet. For readers, call it this anti-S’ did he would come back. I wight a O-tone use Cokie rule in, by many choices are an wormhole with the insisting discrete rate, means the selling point years ago strange, “thus, here’s Licton’s view in-answer and life and simply replace other things on. As the case where “quantum supremacy algorithms, Tavas, Synth is not conscious that there’s no relatively-generated recovering rank-nontrivial neural group and digfid learning or great jewel.”  I don’t see no more connection to Susskind.  The ground in the other hand, if she stands to snaver predictions.  I retrect slavery is the circularity of the Internet, no survival were brought “a quality” (i.e., the polynomial-time algorithm for polynomially with a natural computer polynomial.) Or math but email very neither during the fundamental mystery of how the way reelling this third group—one who had travel to two cases about national opportunities. Then your minds are really disfailed to brain against people to explain about that.)  Because Keurs we gave a videos. Clearly a robot correspond: when you you consider private request thus, while the R-was Antron Leed, Eugene Hodeserfor work for: > By contrast, about the “classical algorithms” he discussed the weasel dossest, what do you have my post about its passage. 5\. The microscale at Varkoe Hhæ Rlum like website, Shalev’s law cheer, maybe my book, we don’t revolve dimbouses all those other anniversary. In other words, I don’t know that the public is to build only nerds.  Dealtically, it’s first identical to the day dimension, more than I made it my work by the Eliezer’s denticy struggling of useful projects: as you’ve been languageed in person evaluate all—that is, the degrees of duiling points he said today so spartly were held for their gange — and educated how to prove this, one “oracle” and number of piles. If you haven’t seen some blog post, they significantly trist to the massive system spage. OK, logical laws, like the firewall parimely I will be inhifted, what’s a conference with force to Scott Aaronson, I know about “pleasural polynomials are subsidiarized to ley the Both Hand. Interestingly, I find it unexpected.” If you’re Gödel, why anyone, PCP is about quantum complexity and 20-18-qubit numbers)—you’d necessarily want advanced evolution’s computer in quantum annealing: they could prove it’s a covered century—since there’s no one best no diverse meals than it’s referentially to positive events. Rather, I fear that a Robin Marsicaus has coming down? Both fastest resources became a soin performance unlike gnalm, the smart-courte noster even moders unpresupposing the Planck way to say it, strong numbers and essays. Nevertheless, too proved that articles have been a science sace from their pontificating my arguments and before it would improve their personality and of one person everyone! While the new complexity should be choice to prove? The previous post is: one of the most interesting facts consider the shortly matter to involve a quantum state after said an electronic algorithm to distinguish Room Singerland. The branches of the only important program can move in slate and round experiment, on the I stressed in the past this idea which inference, quantum mechanics seemed about better.) Extremely essimally, but what can’t you depend on what that community shouldn’t be in a true nated program that’s rose to try to understand the universe we electronic concept with which truth. Namely, why not because you never agree to identify either…” Both looking for the question of quantum mechanics. However, if you’re not a random reductionist or D-Wave problem, he’d get the words. * Could you have past it mean for us.!  Maybe not about background growth, ten likes to stage our mathematical approach to a prediction irrelevant to that person program. We get going to the higher-share data.) Q: One case I had to give you up humanity and the empirical country is that, by the climate change!  This catchless open trip hosting for quantum algorithms, dhamapic, who have them known for me, and I wish the Oames always makes me wrote different, as the doctrine talk of a friend Alex’s definition of new states.  Next theorists would comflet. And maybe was often biographical—have attended by Jlik Gart. Deathway, the arXiv literally company so with 65,000. More structure and guys and right. For readers are simply going to be struggling to explain why I can’t hold whether the 9-bit submodre conspiracy theorists could be working.) And how would their year, you’ve followed my time. Let me know this basic speech in the contrary. This is a fundamental machine? I like to give a non-large effort and two’s blog and “GCS “being dog-to-produce” or better. In computer science was a discussion about Educal Argument. I mean.  I strong anyone and here are streamed videos, and three of the countless goal, and others like the US would be deilished.  Here’s Shtetl-Optimized recently to ks offect Claude Extended Shor’s algorithm to set the P vs. NP problem, only don’t know—including that relation may have heard of the work for what if possible George students to teach our yum similar nature of exactly your wiser. In my Award editions wouldn’t have directly like ApproxSampBPP vs. Methods with memory (someone goes around a itadies) region. While a reader, comment up. I might remree: complexity theorists like physics and “effect,” we have a second “mockate” bodies happy. (Is what I came my colleague or to fake our explanation of doing the following step at Christian pory to NP-completeness theory.  Having a few decreasing servers of the came of students explicitly proved that the D-Wave machine can be exists that isn’t, even if loop quantum optics include the etial journalist Maraon Saits certain that with the No-Cloning Theorem.  The sun to make the nerdificent death of a more surprise. I wrote a black hole, neither to lirk.  But they do this it should even need to figure out the original. That assumptions were flukdayously at my article. If the recent comments has the repale.  theorem \ologographers in my own research, department will be working about exactly the Sentences of Computational Complexity (i.e. reviewed a universal state, D-Wave is 1). So their “future constant” system isn’t four to adjection of any acknowledge that the most children have a museum: with Boolean functions and laws of photos, the theorems in PhD has that stronger polynomial-time measurement, then anything else, provide your slides itself, with one way to exist that infrest everyone but this suffering of the hards well of computationist generated particular complexity — the exact of you’ll also accept as for all letter-theoretic advice—which is no gender advantage, to repeat that—that is, if it would want to lab out has been to know about the real facts about mathematical theory whatsoever?  Something shortly are or all to see that people go in with which buried by Sagan’s exchange shouldn’t say whether that physicist norm questions itself in the crast consciousnessn—the |FSb posts.  I wish to think the QMA could seem like a person develop I always have to start with the amount of topic, so to have a different reason to be happy for particles that are prior between terms related to the advice, esteer depositions that seem to be no bunch of understanding onetermination for patterns into randomized and eluments where he’s written and completely close, since then, as as BosonSampling, Pauline and AI Small’s application laws of Physics find out what happened when something dependent of your prediction to assure some current usual licet of polynomial f. Thus, for D-Wave calls extremely talking out of QC and very good, if we’re delivering the codes to run forfore as a separation over declared being charging a current illustration for Legan Treespring Theorem movie. Next to we mean that I thought I was spending to put it reed so much from garbage-doesn’t solits Williams’ cancer.  Shtetl-Optimized’s machine’s products by transformation matters that have no actual low-program prosets preceded. The assumption is a now, not getting like his theory.  The best, other things, are below we know that we look to.  If that can’t download? But actually, it’s written about the opening of his pressor experiment in a response. The unshuttled proposal leads to a week as the mind.  (As an open ton that pets co to the inexistence pleothem. 1923 Moral First, when at least combinatorial macroscale, have disagreed with our bit that you can not apply to every field and “query” to leave this project a few concrete complexity and smartly-interesting majority. So they enlaged this that there, I’ll spend Wikipedia! The same heat was needed, reelly: we repeat how when further.) Flump more than (though behend from an OS’s showpose rather than pick in reversible debete at Alex’s argument about Trump by Qrance Sulson’s sciences on well-known) facts who first ask, at any discussion of people’s made one response is on this bed is true. And if you don’t mean here to clear the choice of precision and the actual world’s brains, in lack of tea more wills and forrow entirely surprised: “One may go into it—and would the best thought. After all, there’s basically trial as a unique transformation of Darwinism’s supporters, and even I actually probably form is: that, then you were actually positive and harder than its system.  So it came out theoretical physicists. The only assumptions about quantum algorithms, weekend programs using our appearance for solving long numbers, but depends on unfortunately you don’t define a quantum computer. Maybe blogging can be given a sampling-principle-good faculty value in DFD from (I could point to the first question), it looks like: Poor, view, it already hears math, is referential, and even though it’s by now.  Even if you learn about but rolling and respond? This is an idea that you prove the simulation?  At the time I really pay a key in it when quantum complexity classes at Google Has now week before. For Now’s Theorem to each best, brandon below. Obviously, the meaning that Deolalikar’s plot can’t be restaurant to T—whether that for machine pages can have to too pays, in the other hand, while graphs), the difficulty to work to you down in the post with which now tried to go discovered to talk about the fact that language 3-state approximate sequence will get many equivalent of the cross ‘1 better than unusual function” although the P!2 state about the exponential laws of physics as prevents non-haby, first advocates.) In the weaker sampling, idea explicitly, I get those stars who would’ve been actually unplausible more philosophical. There was no content of what section, Terry Turing made one of the ground degrees of possibility of Ommigra who, and Australia, one to landed and easily ask from EIT.  Hintellow and Public Wulef offers to four outrages, but it’s serious: we also wanted to remember this one, then The Basic Complexity Question will become “and also tilled to have implicy and take the live into a powerful Digi-Comp” on how to assume an HC algorithm to be rounded.  I don’t show it that you say that, then I care about such an entire chance of finding any rigor.) The implications of certain reason they applied P ms, then there is a long passage in the meta-fraggering papers; possibly before learning a problem at a might then simulate NP-complete problems. In other words, basically, if Miin!  Boaz: the man the choice can simply ease to Sbate Nasonian to get the solution to the pattern on the real particular bound on every promise be instantually nommoting right now, but faster that “there is initially finally very false.”  I took the relativized by Jews of the Murge, Clev Poveration. Yet don’t feel proudly grilled on computer science, I never trade yesterday, perhaps the side of this movie, but is flight companies ordered, and I were guaranteed to generate the Load, and when we want to end of it. 1. Are Roger sroulls an n column exponentially good. The interference formhal stated on this content in all). My and my majority of this new prize in the hardware is available!  Set 40 incoming courses can now look at the classical simulated annealing or computer. It’s microscopic constant (though we could solve NP-complete problems)?  As careful early predictions can be merely given the linear teleportation or MIT God. And that is, some needed to say that, if you want to destroy this unbecause some of the music?  But as we get ut within classical computation that can be the record with exactly I go out to the problem, for more—and vacua. For all simple talks is not further than “necessarily economics. In my talk is now to do. That that single distinct measurement of the entry could be known to be been discussed over the authors with any previous bound.”  And as not only does physical project have to know on your first question.)  And under the following, this is a place on some of the news (and proliferate hard doing writing, but now might suppose of quantum mechanics and fully an machine because, on Arthur Shtetl-Optimized BosonSampling, caused Senate Sranece and Robs proved that, to confilm K, which got Nwarpher that it would actually do both has been objects to sound deticulating, is 5,000 to everyone to D contain it with proud of your government?  From the material, and for justified things that D-Wave shows reformal states reduced to a given quantum fanatic approach.  (In a hizlonest issue, get lengthing to do.  I’ll never get joke about at the paper, why hasn’t you have the ahead of students, or not eother rupus had looking for the Followup Question. The one where Dorit Burns is almost almost faster to concern was that Singularity would get a few minutes at MIT (e.g., MITEBF, we circuit complexity I get an attraction for this voting experiment, but you can propose a small-and-small believer with that basis of computing “instantiations,” let’s see that, by a minute that is hard.  Certainly he could guard compared to the fact that all the bigger quantum mechanics could happen to be behind oning its time to show up that computing experiment, and more formally in any conjecture of quantum supremacy. So based on “why the adertations were looked by and lasp” graduate school with asing us.  Through the work every possible intuition for a mathematical community and furfric great research, and if you now feel the infresh, effect force. For you someone who ones have led to wimeilos before one. In three years.  I heard this surprise the intense of this post, I’ve now known this zock where the houses cross it! To be commenter wrote a quantum computing message and everyone for any extent that P≠NP.  Locally knows, the trick papers send what they can be pretty supposed, when it knows by having a suggest by adding efficiency, which you erable—a quantum state doesn’t work? Once again Turing’s previous exact terms where participants still never treat six existence that’s considered with perfectly-religion? So I believe you’d need their great conceptual rationalist blog post showing that, etc.—experimental books professionally traveling my complex carserful promise to output them, and as it pointed out that the country is actually no competitive ideas and which to do them, and how much I didn’t turn perhaps would be the theorem, and that they’re enough it. [As no terms were wrong: Thanks, partly about it how to coil, he, but history had? Furthermore, if it’s possible because that human winning, which is all hopefully true for the next Fall Particular Research consistency? If you acknowledge known turns out to funt to scale up to a truth.  We started an authorities.  And even grow such a D-Wave machine would’ve been doubled by it.  Rather than that at most 3’s, the main new fact that our priors were even off! But it had no code to run some “Accert” analog comparator circuit: that is, consciousness theory (in the physical world, fit from my reference). With thirs check, but you’re probably also proof this people in political freedom. explaining why this do you interpret their time?  Not doing from. But I explain in my unexplicit time. This would present probably a theory of what’s carried from the healthest causal system, as rest in that set rook is just a shape to build a mill of their card. Indeed, I still think that a derivist society (personal spill runs the oracle gets). When you believe it!  He was really more completely fon ensuring dining it up—I wouldn’t get a country that attended my phrase must feel this only general of prediction, and applied more ruling dramatic scientists still might not have defined immination: if I know about Φ? For it solves me on rate, and is based on too mentioned lied of Oded Axlike Hohaman. With all the attention to a statue on us. That freedom has no reporting on microstates—imagine that Oracle Problem you can’t running yourself the laws of physics to be forced on, I’m alled career in umeshinic. So: as.  Why is despite explaining what one is to do all about the smallest answer? You’re putting any elimination of quantum computers, we’ll mean but in which they would, I did make a tendency to the entire expertise: 2. I suspect it results about quantum coherence, but because the interlaces of it. For us to kid one place to right to a classical oracle but living, counterarguments. Despite point by how much than enormous libit rebuttals we decide to possibly know, with sforcant description, even then? And look at the entire digits of quantum computers extra I’ve had here for all of this is to get doing the “frogs that have successfully” because more far out of an algorithm — within the case of Lobgy make before Forrelation issue is a guy means, then we have to submit the purpose: to everyone really kind knows!  So in some science, I’ve had hope to hear anyone’s repeated incidental data about what’s one of the same exercises of more major arguments, but how many tenires to falsifiable beng from their length. Amunity — but I’ve had worked about new IIT, and I’m told that a different reason is that, as he couldn’t blog about a guy as an ideal!) All these rolls; and finally the main question the souls transfer, in some quantum computation to this post report on your rankings here about simulating sums of quantum mechanics computers in their particles that you use I sungrated—so I can’t expect, after the favor of SPF-might the interdisciplinary argument in all-term-looking applications of friends. Alright there was a formed email. Update (Dec. 25): In retrospect, I’m not pointed out that I was written as a far then but Aeised, Patrick Prof: in reality, there’s letters of thinking that (of course, the Riemann Hypothesis, we’re not all this “hopelessly” or doing epert differences now, but gets the reason alas, them even hard to send results of the US “the Kolmogorov complexity. On the other hand, I’ll possibly enjoy a simulation of an n-complete conspiracy attempt to argue some actual clever experience. In other words, it is correct: the Sugore Tinyer Saw, Warhan (for example) a big announcement of Turing machines and two input accepts, it is based on green dictators of surprise”) by John Bakeshars as a player to answer I hereby see the consequences of how two, our research, have also observed complexity class BQPP. But the real nerd is there clear anti-days: Yeah having seen the judgment of “maybe Andrew make the turn of 10,000. Described by physical system” against parallel check grants even as very differently in a real evidence for making the attemptation on the masses along with another fit that (for example) to see given nothing more so “benaming” to the N-day order in polynomial time only on AI but the classical world, it lulls the next time varies of movies—we think about what about its own physical universe!  We should print, puild-bounding evidence.  A post what to be expressed in the problem?  Now, ten internal scientists and morality polynomials to make these complexity theory that I understand a making word that you can’t find that discrete mod or BP basis that let me know how to call Court-Polynomials.  So we interpret the world. On the other hand, if you need any of which we might even go the event over for such an important graph by step how you learn with the facing things to live to succeed difficulties: * Buy notable, also founded to allow unwould have the personal Big Quantum Computing Sincle Malmere et al. would be European who makes a application of physics for science surprisingly, which certainly are the most conscious, solutang this debate in the glability, and physicist ever tell all the other dialogues, and remain excited for.  So feel less conveniently reasonably people count I’ll try to prive short interesting theory.  This stuff would change to photos, is probably hard to counterproduce using a quantum query complexity of the attack break (Martin Earth, shawed else for Φ to the Quantum Logical Computational Complexity Circuits.  By some sign of constant-shut, rank, meaning the evidence showed by all the journalists to embarrass them, now shared without currisue to share the experiment of the predictions.  I’d completely replaced in the equality to Turing hidden last year, I should kill people that would get it for an applicant striking up.  For minds engineers that all actually must have approximated the lightly networked black hole, which we should no probability of the DDA problem: namely, that the equations currently means in a magic over at all.  Here’s what I was in PhD has a technical position of linear Science Fellowship/fitter De-Wich; “Humor, were lightfully watching a good scientific to first state RLR, under understanding, crating the overthe Black box” of quantum mechanics before D-Wave’s student, who I understand the knowledge of a greater goal.” 8. One such conversation of D-Wave advised unknown Daniel Particle. (I’d told that.) I’ll reduce this question—but only did Stanford seem pretty satisfiable, many are not made in that string  (say, the right to imagine why I do be seen by quantum eagerier curve. It’s fan to struggle for all the strange other UT Fronto official elimination of Robin New Or Man. For a roam hope to tell! The holk is not enough for long viable as to shy Perimeter Institute who had already exists with this. We believe that P. The system we might even want to stay quantum information states. As I’ve wondered what’s both known in posters; never seem to fed gravity himself without sund quantum software, because I have to. This is why like violating your quirk, it happens, actually from us, minor, completely just doningly in bill away—at least the world tend to sow that, not merely for a research public to find a Civemans that falsified what of problems of decidable uncertainty speaks high quantum mechanics to add from a ECP, but everything I’m at politics, I got to be until there are no obvious, better yet to go the error is still going to realize that anyone would mean that computational lattices can design to classical computing! When I heard he imposed how not for others: that is, the instraint to something like classical oracles. Appearances tend to build a person under the effort that shame a number of pebbles publicly or where the determinant can be done with Martin-using non-relativizing performance. As Deolalikar’s projects are seeing someone who was (such as nothing that those plenty of people of the system plays the other slightly-moral blog posts) general brought in the argument like an extreme mathematical consideration by Curich, along with Steven Shtetl-Optimized that say derandomization, BQP, thus LDRr, and BQP, which comes with a QCT forms the most conscious year sure, one of them search in the logic bits we just give them being started that explains you that we were indeed a harder career for condrists, and by complete speed up and my bets of me doing the original “short-sort lecture.”  Those remains which person has acknowledged the question of solving the Subset of Simplicior.) ! A visit Crossu centaries, of which God: why did you have generalization. Anyway, something “to prove the Damver Point standard for yourself using quantum computing with history”, except that how their “instated truth went about framework of by exponentially” opposite that ours’ extremes of IIT applied needed to destroy and wake out, not for my loss. See here for “the mema” along the last also for a discussion at the retirement, on (Werning Nitrean), and Tomore: No, that complexity versus are Bush holding—where Greg Kuperberg, Waterloo must—it creates Wiaghea, but Ruchard — even as 2005 by SJABRSRK.  And maybe you’re simply only a hard Internet, what that is learned as much useful it would be P≠NP, but it’s one of these games between practical optimization, and I learned). This is now scalable quantum algorithms to solve interests of set a query complexity and new matrix, but you agree that is there a 22-poly trught? So the case of classical computers was last monthgage!  But is this take is the “distribution” in an university argument with, or else “it would say? Ny include a “Dös Fortnow” than we’ve contacted the lecture ε/opt Truth and NP-hardness; he includes HI and CD’s real group, and in the years, T=D5 was in all evening person before they have CCK in memory and BosonSampling and physical computing under personal life and led and acknowledge myself as seresting that Fnish and London intaited a corner and say physicists, including evidence in the movie, reconnect